Screenlight Is Shutting Down: Your Next Review Tool Move
Screenlight is closing its doors. Here is a calm, practical plan to migrate your video review, feedback, approvals and assets without losing a single comment.
A review tool shutting down is not a tragedy. It is a deadline.
When a video review platform announces it is closing, the panic is not really about the software. It is about the years of comments, the approval history, the version trails, and the client relationships that all quietly lived inside that one login. You did not just store files there. You ran your whole feedback loop there. So when the lights go out, it feels like someone unplugged a part of your studio.
Here is the contrarian part. A shutdown is the single best moment to fix the review workflow you have been tolerating for years. Most teams never switch tools because switching feels risky. A forced migration removes the excuse. You get to pick the tool you actually want, not the one you were stuck with. I want to walk you through how to do that cleanly, and why I think PlayPause is the place most teams should land.
You were never going to migrate on a quiet Tuesday. Now you have a reason. Use it to land on a tool that actually fits how your team reviews video.
First, get your data out before the deadline
The clock is the only thing that matters in week one. Comments and source files behind a tool that is winding down can vanish on a date you do not control. So before you compare features, before you debate pricing, you export.
Think about what actually lives inside a review tool. It is not just the videos. It is the conversation around the videos. A timestamped note that says the logo needs to come in two frames earlier is worth more than the raw file, because it is the decision. Lose the decisions and you redo the work.
That last step is where a good destination tool earns its keep. If onboarding the new platform takes a week of training, you have traded one fire for another. You want somewhere you can drop files in and send a link the same afternoon.
What a real review tool does that file transfer never will
When a review platform dies, a lot of teams quietly fall back to what they already have. Email a download link. Drop it in WeTransfer. Share a Google Drive folder. Sync it through Dropbox. I understand the instinct. It feels free and familiar.
It is also a step backward, and I will say exactly why. Email, WeTransfer, Google Drive and Dropbox are file transfer, not review. They move a video from your machine to someone else's. They do not let a client click on the exact frame where the color shifts and leave a note pinned to that moment. They do not stack version three on top of version two so you can see what changed. They do not lock an approval so nobody re-opens a finished cut.
So your feedback scatters. One note in an email, another in a text, a third in a comment on the wrong file. You become the human glue holding a broken thread together, and something always slips.
A download link is not feedback. It is just a way to lose feedback politely.
A proper review tool keeps every note attached to the exact second it refers to. That is the whole game. Frame-accurate comments with drawing and mentions mean a client can circle the thing they mean instead of describing it badly. You stop guessing. You stop re-rendering because someone said "a bit later" and meant something else.
Frame-accurate note, everyone sees the exact same thing.
Why I steer most teams to PlayPause
Let me be direct, because the point here is to give you my honest pick. The default replacement people reach for is Frame.io. It is a capable tool. The catch is the pricing model. Frame.io charges per seat, so every client, every freelance editor, every reviewer you add raises the bill. The more people you collaborate with, the more you pay just to let them leave a comment. That punishes the exact thing a review tool is supposed to encourage.
PlayPause flips that. The pricing is flat per workspace, not per seat. You pay for the workspace, then invite as many clients and collaborators as the work needs without watching a meter. For a studio that brings new clients in and out constantly, that difference compounds fast.
Beyond price, it covers the actual workflow end to end. Frame-accurate comments with drawing and mentions. Version stacks plus side-by-side compare so you can hold v2 and v3 next to each other. Approval locks so a signed-off cut stays signed off. Secure share links with passwords, expiry, domain restriction and watermarking, which matters when you are sending unreleased work to a client's wider team. Guest upload with no account, so a client can send you footage without making one more login. Camera-to-Cloud proxies straight from set. Premiere Pro and After Effects panels so you never leave your editor. Viewer analytics so you know who actually watched. Slack, Microsoft Teams and Zapier to wire it into the rest of your stack. And centralized assets so the project does not scatter across folders again.
That is the point. You are not just replacing the tool that shut down. You are getting the tool you wished you had.
Per-seat fees, scattered email and Drive feedback, no version compare, no frame-accurate notes
Flat per-workspace pricing, frame-accurate comments, version stacks, approval locks, secure share links
A migration that takes an afternoon, not a quarter
Let me make this concrete. Say you run a small studio with four editors and a dozen active clients, and your old review tool just posted its shutdown notice. Here is how the move actually goes.
Monday morning, you export every active project at full resolution and copy the open comment threads into a doc per project. Monday afternoon, you create one PlayPause workspace and drag the in-flight cuts in. You invite your four editors and your clients. Nobody pays per head, so you invite everyone who touches the work. You generate secure share links with expiry and a password for the unreleased pieces, and send them out with a short note: same review, new link, comment right on the frame.
By Tuesday, your first client has left frame-accurate notes on a cut, your editor has stacked the revision as a new version, and you have side-by-side compare open to check the change. The shutdown that felt like a wall turned into a clean upgrade in a day.
- Export all source media at full resolution
- Capture comment threads and approval status per project
- Stand up one workspace and invite every editor and client
- Re-share secure links and confirm clients can comment on the frame
The reason this is fast is the flat pricing and the guest upload. You are not rationing seats or asking clients to register. You remove the friction that usually makes migrations drag, and the whole team is reviewing again before the old tool even goes dark.
The bottom line
A review tool shutting down forces a decision you have probably been avoiding. You can react by retreating to email and Drive, and quietly accept worse feedback forever. Or you can use the deadline to land on a tool built for review, where comments stick to frames, versions stack, approvals lock, and you do not pay more every time you add a collaborator.
Get your data out first. Then pick the tool you actually want. For most teams, that is PlayPause, because the workflow is complete and the pricing does not punish collaboration.
Start free today. Create a PlayPause workspace, drag in your active cuts, invite your clients, and send your first secure review link this afternoon. The migration is the easy part once you have somewhere worth migrating to.
Saumyajit co-founded PlayPause after years watching review and approval quietly eat creative teams' deadlines. He writes about the workflow side of video, feedback, versioning, and getting to a clean sign-off.
Related resources
Keep reading
Bring your team into one review space
Centralize feedback, lock approvals, and deliver faster, start free today.
Sign Up for Free