New 250GB Plans LIVE now. See plans →
All posts
February 10, 2026 · Workflow

Keeping Dialogue and Music Mix Notes Separate During a Spotting Session Review

Keeping dialogue and music mix notes separate during a spotting session review prevents costly sound mix confusion. Here is how to structure the session so nothing gets crossed.

PM
Priya Menon
Video Marketing Writer, PlayPause
Workflow

A spotting session is one of the most information-dense meetings in post-production. You are watching the cut, making decisions about music cues, flagging dialogue ADR, noting temp music that needs to be replaced, and discussing sound design needs, all at the same time. The director has opinions. The music supervisor has opinions. The sound editor has a list. Everyone is talking about different layers of the audio.

When dialogue and music mix notes get tangled together, the downstream result is confusion for the sound department. The mixer gets notes that are half about dialogue issues and half about score placement, mixed together in an email chain with no clear attribution. Hours get spent decoding who wanted what and which note applies to which layer of the mix.

Here is how to structure the spotting session review so that the dialogue mix notes and the music mix notes stay cleanly separate from the start.

Why Mixing These Note Streams Creates Problems

Dialogue mix notes go to the dialogue editor and re-recording mixer. Music mix notes go to the music supervisor, the composer, and the mixer. These are often different people, and even when they are the same mixer, the notes need to be acted on in different sessions: the dialogue pass and the music and effects pass are distinct workflows.

When the notes are combined, the mixer has to manually sort them, which creates errors. A note that says "the music in this scene is competing with the dialogue" could be a dialogue level note (bring the dialogue up) or a music level note (bring the cue down) or both. Without separation, the mixer guesses. Guesses cost time.

Combined spotting notes in email or PDF

Mixer sorts by hand, unclear attribution, dialogue and music notes confused, double handling

Separate review channels in PlayPause

Dialogue notes in one thread, music notes in another, each routed to the right department immediately

Setting Up the Spotting Session Review

The key structural decision is to have separate review channels for dialogue and music before the session starts. I do this in PlayPause by setting up two comment tags or two separate review sessions within the same project. One is labeled "Dialogue / ADR" and one is labeled "Music / Score."

When a reviewer leaves a note, they select the appropriate tag. The sound editor's ADR notes land in the dialogue channel. The music supervisor's cue notes land in the music channel. At the end of the session, you have two clean note lists instead of one tangled combined list.

For the spotting session itself, I also recommend a third channel: "Sound Design / SFX." This is often the most overlooked note category in a combined session, and it frequently gets buried under the music discussion.

Note Channel Goes To Examples
Dialogue / ADR Dialogue editor, re-recording mixer Line pick replacements, ADR cues, intelligibility fixes
Music / Score Composer, music supervisor, mixer Cue in and out points, temp music references, score intention notes
Sound Design / SFX Sound designer, sound editor Foley needs, ambient texture notes, specific FX moments
Review_Cut_v4.mp4In Review
212160p · ProRes
00:34 / 02:18
SR
Sarah 0:34

Frame-accurate note, everyone sees the exact same thing.

In PlayPause, every comment is pinned to the exact frame, no more “which part?” email threads.

Running the Session Async vs Live

Spotting sessions can be run live (everyone watching together on a call) or async (each person reviews and leaves notes independently). There are arguments for both.

Live spotting sessions are great for creative alignment: the director can explain intent in real time, and the music supervisor can respond immediately. But they require everyone in the room at the same time, which is increasingly difficult across different cities and time zones.

Async spotting works well when the reviewers are experienced and disciplined about leaving clear notes. The director watches and leaves music intention notes. The sound editor watches and flags ADR lines. The music supervisor watches and marks cue boundaries. Everyone works on their own time, and the note streams stay separate because each person is focused on their specific area.

For international co-productions or distributed teams, async spotting with a 48-hour window is often the most practical approach. The async video feedback workflow applies here even though the context is post-production rather than creator content.

1Brief all reviewers before the spotting session on which note channel to use for which type of note
2Set up three channels in PlayPause: dialogue, music, and sound design
3Run the session async with a 48-hour window if stakeholders are in different locations
4Compile each channel's notes separately after the window closes
5Route each note list to the correct department without combining them

The Music Intention Note Versus the Technical Mix Note

One of the most common confusions in spotting sessions is between music intention notes (what emotional quality the music should have, where the cue should start and end, what the temp track is trying to do) and technical mix notes (the music is too loud in this scene, the cue end is abrupt).

These are both valid note types, but they go to different people. Intention notes go to the composer. Technical mix notes go to the mixer. For more on how sound notes fit into the broader post workflow, see sound mix approval workflow for narrative films with multiple stakeholders and how to prevent a sound designer from working off an outdated cut. When they are combined in the same thread, both the composer and the mixer end up with notes that are partially for them and partially not.

I train review participants to distinguish these explicitly. An intention note sounds like: "The temp cue here is from a thriller, but this scene is actually meant to feel hopeful. The final score should feel more like a homecoming than a threat." A technical note sounds like: "The music at 00:47:20 is sitting about 6dB too hot, burying the dialogue."

Intention belongs to the composer, level belongs to the mixer

If you conflate them, both people end up guessing about what they actually need to do. Separate the note types before the session even starts.

Closing the Loop After the Spotting Session

Once the spotting session notes are compiled and separated, the final step is getting confirmations that each department received and understood their notes. This is not a bureaucratic exercise. It is a check that prevents the situation where a note falls through because nobody was sure which department owned it.

In PlayPause, you can assign comments or reply to notes with a confirmation. The dialogue editor replies to the ADR notes with "confirmed, 14 lines flagged for ADR." The composer replies to the music notes with "received, will address the act two cue placement." The record is in the platform, not in someone's inbox.

For productions where structured comment workflows are used for sound editors reviewing picture-locked cuts, this closing-the-loop step is already built into the process. If it is not part of your current workflow, it is worth adding.

For teams managing handoffs between departments, the handoff checklist from picture lock to sound design is worth reading alongside this post.

The spotting session is where the sound track of a film is architected. Getting the note-taking structure right means every department can start their work with clarity, and the mixer does not spend the first day of the mix session sorting out what was meant by what.

You can share any spotting session cut through PlayPause's secure video review links and keep all notes organized by department without any extra setup.

Start with PlayPause free and set up your first spotting session with separated note channels. The Creator plan at $9 per month is more than enough for a single-project spotting workflow.

PM
Priya Menon
Video Marketing Writer, PlayPause

Priya Menon writes about video marketing and content workflows for PlayPause. She covers how marketing teams, brands, and creators review video, approve campaigns, and ship content faster.

Related resources

Keep reading

Bring your team into one review space

Centralize feedback, lock approvals, and deliver faster, start free today.

Sign Up for Free